Inexperienced chairs
A slow start in the business stakeholders debate with technical issues plaguing the debate. By 930 the committee still had not gotten underway. Most delegates opted to go for while the only delegates going against were the investors and the partner firms. No rules of procedure were followed at all. Role call was not taken. A motion is required to open the general speakers’ list but the head of the summit began adding people without a motion. Furthermore, most delegates weren’t willing to speak in the gsl. Chairs had to force the delegates to speak. When the gsl finally began the delegate representing consumers was interrupted thrice. The head chair seemed confused by the timer. Moreover, he constantly had technical issues and was interrupting delegates because of this. Chairs did not realize that they need to take into account all motions before voting. Formalities were not used at all and delegates were called by their first name by the head of the summit. The deputy chair was repeatedly ignored when she tried to make corrections to the rules of procedure. Overall the opening session was horrendous but this was most likely due to the lack of experienced chairs. Hopefully, as the conference goes on the chairs will improve as they gain experience.
Yajush Jayakrishnan NYT
Comments
Post a Comment